Accountable ASCs

By: Nawa Arsala Lodin

Quality, transparency, patient advocacy- three themes in Dr. Marty Makary’s New York Times Bestseller- Unaccountable. With these three tenets that Dr. Makary has essentially devoted his career, and this book to, it is quite baffling to see how he missed the mark when he describes Ambulatory Surgery Centers (ASCs).

Transparency– Dr. Makary describes in shocking historic detail, how hard hospitals around the country work to keep quality reporting private. Further, he describes how hospitals tried to resist reporting quality at all. On the contrary, in 2006, the ASC community began advocating to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to establish a uniform quality reporting system that would allow ASCs to publicly demonstrate their performance on quality measures. The ASC community together volunteered this information, and lobbied CMS to create the CMS the Ambulatory Surgical Center Quality Reporting (ASCQR) Program on October 1, 2012. This culture of transparency is what Dr. Makary seems to long for in his book. He praises the national registries and special societies that accurately measure patient outcomes in the hospital setting. Dr. Makary rightly believes that these measures create more accountability, and thus better outcomes for patients. However, in the hospital setting, these measures are not for the public. As Dr. Makary states, they are “locked and sealed” and considered “sensitive data.” As such, it’s confusing to see how Dr. Makary’s criticism of ASCs.

 Quality– Mr. Makary repeatedly makes it seems as though ASCs are rouge facilities. He explicitly states that ASCs are less safe place to be and if it were him, he would choose an HOPD. Unfortunately, the patient’s choice of site of care isn’t that simple. The notion that ASCs are “less safe” compared to the HOPD setting is simply untrue. In fact, here is a graphic that shows the safety requirements between ASCs and HOPDs.

MedicareHealthRequirements.jpg

Currently, according to the Ambulatory Surgery Center Association, there are more than 5,400 Medicare-certified ASCs throughout the country that meet or exceed the health and safety standards set by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). These ASCs must also comply with an extensive set of infection prevention standards that are monitored internally at each ASC daily and evaluated by external inspectors.

 In addition to the extensive requirements already in place by CMS, more than two-thirds of ASCs seek voluntary accreditation from one of four accrediting bodies: the Joint Commission, the American Association for Accreditation of Ambulatory Surgery Facilities, The Accreditation Association for Ambulatory Health Care, Healthcare Facilities Accreditation Program and the Institute for Medical Quality. This voluntary accreditation, and the majority of ASCs who participate in it, once again speaks to the ASC culture of quality and transparency.

 Further, Dr. Makary’s comparison of being in an ASC like being in a “creek without a paddle is provocative and misleading. As stated in 42 CFR 416 and 482, ASCs are required to have a written hospital transfer agreement, and all physicians must have operating privileges within those hospitals, in the unlikely event a patient is transferred to a hospital from an ASC.

 Patient Advocacy– Dr. Makary believes in a patient advocating for themselves and making informed choices on behalf of their care. The blind and natural decision would always default to going to a hospital, even for the most simple of procedures. However, do those simple procedures really need to be at a hospital- where the cost is incredibly higher, the stay is generally longer, and in some cases, a more dangerous setting? More and more studies show that healtheconomics and cost of care impacts at patient’s overall health. In today’s healthcare world it is unwise to not examine healthcare costs when designing a patient’s care. Naturally, because hospitals are massive facilities, with hundreds of employees, the overhead costs are greatly more than that of an ASC. This is one of the many reasons, Medicare pays 47% of what it pays to the hospital for the same exact procedure. As such, many informed patient advocate to have their procedures in the ASC. Whether the reason is because of the lower infection rates, the lower cost, or the ability to leave the same day, patients should discuss this with their doctors to determine what is best for them. Ideally, a doctor will review a patient’s comorbidities and the complexity of the procedure, taking a holistic approach and deciding. As such, blindly selecting the hospital every time is irresponsible advice from Dr. Makary.

Dr. Makary and ASCs celebrate many of the same ideals. It is where healthcare should be going. A safe, regulated, transparent site of care, that puts the patient first. It’s unfortunate Dr. Makary does not see that.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s